|
William James: The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) Summary. The aim here is to summarise the work generally, highlighting ideas of particular interest.
James starts the second half of his lecture series by proposing to describe what he calls the the best fruits of religious experience are the best things that history has to show. [p 259] The writer describes his fruits in terms of The collective name for the ripe fruits of religion in a character is Saintliness. The saintly character is the character for which spiritual emotions are the habitual centre of the personal energy; and there is a certain composite photograph of universal saintliness, the same in all religions, of which the features can easily be traced. [p 271] The four fruitsSpecifically, the fruits are, with the writer's own numbering: 1. A feeling of being in a wider life than that of this world's selfish little interests; and a conviction, not merely intellectual, but as it were sensible, of the existence of an Ideal Power. In Christian saintliness this power is always personified as God; but abstract moral ideas, civic or patriotic utopias, or inner visions of holiness or right may also be felt as the true lords and enlargers of our life ... Characteristics of saintlinessJames further identifies the a. Asceticism.- The self-surrender may ... so overrule the ordinary inhibitions of the flesh that the saint finds positive pleasure in sacrifice and asceticism. ... Five fruits, with examplesThe rest of the material on saintliness is devoted to examples of The first fruit in this series is The second fruit is The third fruit is The craving for moral consistencyThe fourth fruit is When the craving for moral consistency and purity is developed to this degree, the subject may well find the outer world too full of shocks to dwell in, and can unify his life and keep his soul unspotted only by withdrawing from it. [p 296] A fifth fruit is ObedienceJames ends his analysis of saintliness with discussions of two of the monastic vows, obedience and poverty. Regarding obedience, he comments that it is a mystery to him, but: it evidently corresponds to a profound interior need of many persons, and we must do our best to understand it. [p 311] PovertySimilarly regarding poverty: Since Hindu fakirs, Buddhist monks, and Mohammedan dervishes unite with Jesuits and Franciscans in idealizing poverty as the loftiest individual state, it is worth while to examine it on spiritual grounds for such a seemingly unnatural opinion. [p 317] The writer's main conclusion here is that possessions get in the way of action: Only those who have no private interests can follow an ideal straight away. [p 319] NOTES1 George FoxFor comment, go to Religious geniuses on the Issues page. [Back to Article] (c) John C Durham, 2002
|